Some respondents find businesses are worried about the quality of the service respondents’ offer when they describe their work as a social enterprise: “It implies a population that needs help and that may not be job ready.” It does not sound serious – either with respect to the quality of work being delivered, or the way the social enterprise would interact with the business (i.e. securing the work, contracting, reporting, relationship management). In some cases, the term SE can lead customers/businesses to conclude that a SE’s services are not relevant to them – for example, some businesses confuse the term for “social responsibility”.
Using the Term “Social Enterprise” with Funders: Respondents say using the term social enterprise to describe their work to funders highlights their social impact. Using the term also allows funders to have a better understanding of social enterprise and they like the utility of unrestricted earned income supporting a social mission. Funders also appreciate the innovativeness of social enterprises. Other respondents say funders don’t “get it” when they use the term social enterprise, which can lead to incorrect conclusions that their products/services are not relevant to funders. Another drawback is social enterprise doesn’t always fit in the traditional workforce approach with regards to funding. This leads to funders’ confusion on why they should need social enterprises and where their funds go, as well as signal that there is less of a need for funding.
Respondents voice common questions they receive from funders such as, “If you are sustainable, why should I help?” and, “Where are my funds put to use in your business?” Other respondents say the term social enterprise lacks meaning and is a buzzword, whereas others suggest there are no drawbacks to using the term.
Get More here:
اترك تعليقاً